If you have carefully reviewed our “9
Essential Features for the Cruising Catamaran
” you are now armed with
the things to look for in a catamaran design.
Our evaluation of the designers and their designs is from the point of view
of the home builder. This means we are looking at the boats that can be readily
built by an individual or husband/wife team. As Richard Woods says in his literature,
“Boats of over 40 feet should not be built by the solo home builder because
they just take too long. Life is too short,” and I would agree. The boatyards
and backyards of the world are littered with uncompleted boats which have simply
overwhelmed their builders.
The comments that follow may be a little candid but they are based on our boat-
building experience. All the boats described below, if built properly, are ocean-going
boats. Our ratings of these designers are not an evaluation on whether their
designs are good or bad, but more on their suitability for you building the
design as a solo home builder. Some of their larger designs may also be good
projects only if you are going to have the boat custom built for you or if you
have hired help assisting you in your project.
is based in the UK and is a well established catamaran designer. One thing that
separates Richard from some of the other designers is that he has built many
of his boats. I believe he is built over a dozen. His latest his the Eclipse
32 pictured on the right. That’s a lot of boat building. I think this coupled
with his extensive sailing experience is why his boats are so practical. These
are boats he wants to sail. As you know from reading other parts of our website,
in 1997 we decided on Richard’s 28.5 foot Gypsy design. He had just built his
own. He said, “this design incorporates all that we have learnt about cruising,
living on board, and sailing boats in over 60,000 miles of sailing.” Click
here for a full description of the Gypsy design
used in the creation in
We are probably a little biased towards Richard’s design’s but that is because
we are so happy with the package of features our boat has. He had many smaller
designs in the 20 to 25 foot range, but the Gypsy is the smallest boat that
he considered to be a minimum ocean cruiser.
Some people will say that 28.5 feet is just too small a boat for ocean cruising.
We would disagree and so does Richard who specifies that “the Gypsy is
good for trade wind ocean voyaging but not for going around Cape Horn”
(so Carllie constantly reminds me.)
What you have to remember is that most cruising boats are “manned”
by a husband and wife team. Half the time under watch the boat will be operated
by the smallest crew member which usually is the wife. On our boat Carllie can
only operate the entire boat without my help. There are two easy to use 2-speed
Andersen self-tailers. She can even haul up our main 22 lb Delta anchor by hand
(even when Garett, The Windlass is too tired). Last summer, we met some people
who had chartered a Lagoon 42 up in Desolation Sound. They invited us aboard
their boat for a little tour. It was beautiful, enormous, and very very comfortable;
but, and that is a big “but
“, there is no
that boat could be handled by my wife, Carllie, on her own, and
it may even be difficult for me. If the wife/partner/mate cannot handle the
boat alone she is forced to wake up her husband on his off-watch. All this can
be quite exhausting on a passage. What happens if the husband gets hurt or they
get into heavy weather?
Richard builds his own boats, he, like you, wants to build the boat as fast
as possible. The Gypsy and the 34-foot Romany (same bridge deck as Gypsy but
longer hulls) use flat panel construction.
Thus type of construction uses a flat mold which is quickly put together in
about a day. You then lay up the fiberglass foam hull panels, 4 sides and 2
bottoms. The panels are then laid over the bulkheads. You might think that this
might make the boat look boxy or home made but again Multihulls Magazine used
a picture of Light Wave
for its September 2002 cover
so it can’t be that bad.
Using this method, we made our two hulls in about 6 weeks. As well, the outside
of the hulls come out almost perfectly fair, which saved us several hundred
hours of back-breaking fairing and sanding.
If we had the choice we would have built the 34-foot Romany (if the design
had been available back in 1997 ….) with its longer hulls with their load
capacity. Load capacity is the only thing we have to watch for on the Gypsy
28. He also has the 32 foot Eclipse as well as, the 38-foot Transat.
Richard’s personal support during the building process was excellent in the
many overseas telephone calls I placed to him. The only negative comment I would
have would be relative to the level of detail on his plans. All the key items
are there to build the basic structure but there are gaps relative to executing
some of the interior and finishing details. This wasn’t really a problem as
it allowed some creativity and some improved ideas ( i.e. sliding hatches into
the hulls, cockpit seat backs, higher cuddy bridgedeck floor, etc.) .
Even with this small drawback, we would highly Richard’s designs as they are
specifically made for the home builder. Our top choice in terms of design is
the Romany 34
. I would estimate the construction time as 3,500
to 4,000 hours.
Schionning designs catamarans in Australia, and though some of his designs are
built by commercial builders, most are built by people just like you with a
One of Schionning’s real innovations is the Wilderness series which goes from
9 meters up to 17. These boat are built from prefab epoxy Duracore™ (balsa
core) panels. These panels are made under very controlled conditions. Using
CAD technology, the pieces are then cut by computer-controlled milling machines
and then shipped to the home builder. They are then glued and joined by the
builder. This is one step ahead of the flat panel method that Richard Woods
uses because these prefab panels are made out of epoxy and the resin to glass
resin is very controlled. This results in a exceptionally light and strong panels
and consequently a very quickly built quality boat.
Schionning sells the panels marked and ready to cut and join. Based on the
launching notices he publishes on his website, there are lot of people Schionning
Another of Schionning innovations is using outboard motors in vertical wells
aft the end of each hull. You get the weight advantage of the new breed of 4-stroke
Hondas and Yamahas as well as quicker installation, easier maintenance, and
lower weight. He uses the outboard option on his designs up to 15 meters.
We seriously looked at the Wilderness 1100 (11 meter) as our next boat about
2 years ago. It may still be our next boat, but we will wait until we get back
from our 18-month cruise in our current boat starting in July 2006. Even though
Wilderness 1100 is 7 feet bigger that Light Wave
took 3500 hours to build, I would estimate the time to build at 4,000 hours
because of the time-saving panel construction method.
So our top recommendation here is the Wilderness 1100
White’s book, The Cruising Multihull
, got me going
on multihulls about 10 years ago.
Chris has built many of his own designs. His own boat (as of a couple of years
ago) was a 55-foot trimaran of his design called Juniper
that he designed and built himself. He also offer several smaller trimaran designs
for the racer/cruiser.
In the catamaran area, his trademark boat is the Atlantic 42. As mentioned
on our “Building a Cat” page, this design was on our shortlist when
we were trying to decide on which catamaran to build.
main innovation of the Atlantic 42 is that the cockpit is positioned in
of the pilothouse. This design feature has been incorporated
into a few other mega-catamaran such as the Gunboat 62 and the big Gold Coast
In our marina we recently had an Atlantic 42 in our marina that was for sale.
We got to carefully go through the boat and the layout really works. The steering
view from the protected pilothouse is fantastic and protected from the weather.
When you do have to work the sails, you open the front door and walk out into
the central cockpit where all the sail handling is located. You are completely
protected in this sunken cockpit and you are a good 8 feet from the edges of
Back in the pilothouse, the aft settee is at the rear of the boat where there
is the absolute least amount of motion. It is a great boat, but a big
. It seems huge compared to our 28-foot Light Wave
Another plus of the Atlantic 42 is that the engines are in separate compartments
accessible only from the outside aft decks. Many designers tend to “hide”
diesels in catamarans under the aft berths. Inevitably the smell, heat, and
noise leaks into the aft cabin making it unpleasant to live and sleep in. As
well, there is a full length sound proofing bulkhead that completely separates
the engine rooms from the rest of the boat.
White’s specs the hulls to be built in strip cedar and, based on the fairing
involved, I would estimate the time to build at 6,000 to 7,000 hours. White
offers larger 46 and 48 foot versions but these would be truly big projects.
However, these boats have been built by a few commercial builders so they do
come up on the used market frequently.
So my recommendation here is the Atlantic 42
, but it is a
There are more Wharram catamarans out sailing than any other designer. James
Wharram pioneered designing catamarans for the homebuilder. All of his designs
show definite Polynesian roots in their canoe stern and V-shaped hulls. Many
of his first generation models: Iriki, Narai, Tangaroa, and Tehini where designed
for wood construction before epoxy became available. After 30 years many of
these boats, if not very maintained, can appear quite run down.
Wharrams’s latest design – Pahi and Tiki – are much more modern, and were designed
to use current epoxy methods. These designs also incorporate a small bridge
deck cabin as in our Woods Gypsy, but it is smaller without any standing headroom.
The boat picture above is the Tiki 46
and it is our top recommendation.
Though it is longer than the other designs from the other designers I’ve reviewed,
this is because of the canoe shape of the hulls, so in fact, this boat is comparable
to 35 foot designs. I would estimate the time to build one at 4,000 to 5,000
These are the top 4. I will be adding others over the next few months so please
check back soon.